Cases 11 - 20 of 122
JACKSON v. CONGRESS ALL GOVERNMENT STATE CITY et al
as 4:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
REGINALD JACKSON
Defendant:
CONGRESS ALL GOVERNMENT STATE CITY, ARMY RESERVED TEAM EVERY CAMP, OBAMA LEVEL 1 AND 3 NATIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Day v. 21st Century Centennial Insurance Company et al
as 8:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
Roy A. Day
Defendant:
21st Century Centennial Insurance Company, GEICO General Insurance Company, Donald Trump and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOORER v. TRUMP
as 3:2021cv00872
Defendant:
DONALD TRUMP
Plaintiff:
CLEVEN MOORER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRETT v. DONALD TRUMP et al
as 1:2021cv00073
Defendant:
DONALD TRUMP, DAVID SAMPSON and WILLIAM BARR
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Biden et al
as 3:2021cv00429
Defendant:
Vladmir Putin, Joe Biden, Donald Trump and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence D. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Haile et al v. Collins et al
as 1:2021cv20851
Plaintiff:
John Haile, DRF, PBS and others
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Inspector General of the United States, Clifford Rhodes, P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 8:2021cv00184
Defendant:
The White House, Department of Defense, Donald Trump and others
Plaintiff:
Kenyetta Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brett v. Trump et al
as 8:2021cv00175
Defendant:
Donald Trump and William Barr
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 6:2021cv00024
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo
Defendant:
Proland Management, City of Los Angeles California, Six Unknown Names Agents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STONE v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2020cv00588
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, LAUREL ISICOFF, JOE BIDEN and others
Plaintiff:
BARBARA STONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
