Cases 11 - 20 of 84
Davis v. Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH et al
as 3:2023cv22955
Plaintiff:
Douglas G Davis
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Promeco S.A .de C.V. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Blake v. Young et al
as 3:2023cv00399
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Blake
Defendant:
E. S. Young, R. Covey, W. Shomp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. White et al
as 3:2023cv00341
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Blake
Defendant:
Officer White, H. Coovey, E. Prock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Danforth et al
as 5:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Davis
Defendant:
Warden William Danforth, Ricky Stone, Dr. Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. Tyree et al
as 3:2022cv00846
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Blake
Defendant:
C. A. Tyree, Gwava, T. McDarby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Walmart, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
Troy G. Davis
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc., John Doe and John Doe Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ralston Davis v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 22-10998
Petitioner / Appellant:
RALSTON G. DAVIS
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Lee v. Inch, et al
as 5:2021cv00354
In Re:
E. Hurst
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Lee
Defendant:
Mark Inch, Jon Doe, JHON DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2021cv00104
Plaintiff:
Charles G. Davis and CHARLES G DAVIS
Defendant:
AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv02964
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JORDAN G DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
