Cases 11 - 20 of 49
Gege Odion v. Google, Inc., et al
as 17-12391
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEGE ODION
Defendant - Appellee:
GOOGLE INC., JAMES P. BLUM, JR., CYNTHIA D. WRIGHT and others
e-ventures Worldwide, LLC v. Google, Inc.
as 17-11178
Plaintiff - Appellant:
E-VENTURES WORLDWIDE, LLC, 9045 Strada Stell Court, Suite 103, Naples, Fl 34109
Defendant - Appellee:
GOOGLE, INC., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043
Medland v. Google, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00900
Plaintiff:
George Medland
Defendant:
Google, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bugoni v. Castor et al
as 8:2015cv01194
Plaintiff:
Piero A. Bugoni
Defendant:
Jane Castor, Eric Ward, FNU Carithers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gege Odion v. Google Inc., et al
as 15-11145
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEGE ODION, individually, and doing business as Siris Property Management, LLC, doing business as Optiworld Vision Center
Defendant - Appellee:
GOOGLE INC., JAMES P. BLUM,, JR., CYNTHIA D. WRIGHT and others
Defendant:
SERVICE
E-Ventures Worldwide, LLC v. Google, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00646
Plaintiff:
E-Ventures Worldwide, LLC
Defendant:
Google, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morris v. Google, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv02987
Plaintiff:
Darron L. Morris
Defendant:
Google, Inc. and Youtube, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Visual Real Estate, Inc. v. Google Inc.
as 3:2014cv00274
Plaintiff:
Visual Real Estate, Inc.
Defendant:
Google Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Gege Odion v. Google Inc., et al
as 14-12394
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEGE ODION, individually, and, d.b.a. Siris Property Management, LLC, d.b.a. Optiworld Vision Center
Defendant - Appellee:
GOOGLE INC., JAMES P. BLUM, JR., CYNTHIA D. WRIGHT and others
Defendant:
SERVICE
Rubbo v. Google, Inc.
as 0:2014cv60476
Plaintiff:
Joseph Rubbo, Pasquale Rubbo, Angela Rubbo and others
Defendant:
Google, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
