Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Riggins v. Woodruff et al
as 1:2022cv04590
Petitioner:
Daryl (Dewayne) Riggins
Respondent:
Sheriff, Mr. James Woodruff, Dr. Peter (John) Skandalakis, A. Quillian Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gates v. Woodruff et al
as 3:2022cv00121
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Gates
Defendant:
James Woodruff, Angela Woody and Nurse Chris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Woodruff et al
as 3:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
Sandy E. Smith
Defendant:
Sheriff James Woodruff, Deandre Walton, Steven Crowder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rutledge v. Unknown District Attorney et al
as 3:2021cv00161
Plaintiff:
Latego Anquan Rutledge
Defendant:
Unknown District Attorney, Unknown GST, Unknown Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nickence v. Hoppe et al
as 3:2021cv00135
Plaintiff:
Ryan Joseph Nickence
Defendant:
Terrance Hoppe, Charles Brown, Vickie Sue McWaters and others
Respondent:
James Woodruff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nickence v. Daniels et al
as 3:2021cv00128
Plaintiff:
Ryan Joseph Nickence
Defendant:
Johnney Daniels, Roman Vandiver, James Woodruff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams Bey v. Perez et al
as 3:2021cv00123
Plaintiff:
Darrell Willliams Bey
Defendant:
Maxwell Perez, M. Rakestraw, Jeff Sheppard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rutledge v. McDowell et al
as 3:2021cv00112
Plaintiff:
Markeith Anton Rutledge
Defendant:
Cody McDowell, William C. Price, Marla Chambliss and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. Woodruff et al
as 3:2021cv00031
Defendant:
Sheriff James Woodruff, Captain Marty Reeves and Angela Woodie
Plaintiff:
Mr. Sandy E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dehart v. Woodruff et al
as 3:2021cv00028
Defendant:
Sheriff James Woodruff, Captain Marty Reeves and Angela Woodie
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dehart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
