Cases 11 - 20 of 30
United States of America et al v. Sears Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2013mc22949
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of California , State of Florida and others
Defendant:
Sears Holdings Corporation and Kmart Corporation
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Pecot v. Jimenez et al
as 1:2013cv00100
Plaintiff:
Mariellen Pecot
Defendant:
Armando Jimenez, Rolim & Santos Delivery and Logistics, LLC, Sears Holding Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Pemberton v. Rexon Industrial Corp. et al
as 6:2012cv00802
Plaintiff:
Charles Pemberton
Defendant:
Rexon Industrial Corp. , Power Tools Specialists, Inc. , Sears Roebuck & Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FOUNTAIN v. REXON INDUSTRIAL CORP
as 3:2012cv00123
Plaintiff:
BILLY FOUNTAIN
Defendant:
REXON INDUSTRIAL CORP , POWER TOOLS SPECIALISTS INC , SEARS ROEBUCK & CO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-10657
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Parker v. Sears Holding Corporation
as 1:2011cv20487
Plaintiff:
Penny L Parker
Defendant:
Sears Holding Corporation
Mediator:
Karen Evans
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0754
Vela et al v. Rubio et al
as 1:2010cv24011
Plaintiff:
Manuel Vela and Carla Vela
Defendant:
Rhina Molinares Rubio and Sears Holding Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
