Cases 11 - 20 of 39
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv39953
Plaintiff:
CLAYTON STEVEN JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv35985
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowden v. Camacho et al
as 3:2021cv00027
Defendant:
Jesus Camacho, J. Steven Jones, W.C. Moody and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bowden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv84328
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv81481
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES STEVEN JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv77490
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv37470
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv76333
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALLEN et al v. WHITE OAK PASTURES INC
as 1:2020cv00060
Plaintiff:
EDDIE WESLEY, MORTON BRIMBERRY, CODY MILBURN and others
Defendant:
WHITE OAK PASTURES INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
USA v. Steven Jones
as 19-11505
Defendant / Appellant:
STEVEN JONES, a.k.a. T a.k.a. T.Y. a.k.a. Y.T. a.k.a. Tyshawn a.k.a. New Jack a.k.a. Pepito
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
