Cases 11 - 20 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jean-Baptiste v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2023cv22761
Plaintiff:
Harold Jean-Baptiste
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Attorney General of the United States, Federal Bureau of Investigations and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Jean-Baptiste v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2023cv22531
Plaintiff:
Harold Jean-Baptiste
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Merrick B. Garland, Federal Bureau of Investigations and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01131
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv22000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
In Re: Czech Republic
as 1:2023mc21769
In Re:
U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, MIAMI
Plaintiff:
Czech Republic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv81431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: Kartarius Dewan Johnson
as 22-11627
Petitioner:
In re: KARTARIUS DEWAN JOHNSON, a.k.a. Tareeq Akhil Anad
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. DISTRICT COURT OF THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA and others
Rakesh VermaIn re: Rakesh Verma
as 21-14506
Petitioner:
In re: RAKESH VERMA
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, FEDERAL DEFENDER and FLORIDA MIDDLE DISTRICT COURT
Johnson v. Byers et al
as 6:2021cv01473
Plaintiff:
Clarence D. Johnson
Defendant:
Angela Byers, Capitol Hill Police, Alayne Frankson Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
