Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 21
In re: Hercules Yarns
as 16-12788
Petitioner: In re: HERCULES YARNS
Successive Habeas Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Hercules Yarns
as 16-12759
Petitioner: In re: HERCULES YARNS
Successive Habeas Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Yarns v. United States of America
as 9:2016cv80762
Plaintiff: Hercules Yarns
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Yarn v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2015cv02729
Petitioner: Dwight V. Yarn
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Yarn v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2015cv00135
Petitioner: Lamont Yarn
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Elliott et al v. Jones et al
as 0:2014cv61886
Plaintiff: Brigitte N Elliott and BZ Knitter, LLC
Defendant: Fontelle Jones and Great Yarns, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501
Yarn v. Knight et al
as 8:2014cv01193
Plaintiff: Joshua Yarn
Defendant: Thomas Knight, Zackery Lewis, Brandon Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yarns v. United States of America
as 9:2013cv80910
Plaintiff: Hercules Yarns
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States of America v. One Unisex Bracelet with Black Yarn and Black/Onyx Diamonds et al
as 1:2011cv03226
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: One Unisex Bracelet with Black Yarn and Black/Onyx Diamonds, One Rolex Watch, Serial No. M702929 and One White Gold Diamond Tennis Bracelet
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Yarns v. Florida Attorney General
as 3:2007cv00136
Petitioner: Norman R. Yarns
Respondent: Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?