Cases 21 - 30 of 151
Piucci v. The Clorox Sales Company
as 1:2019cv03759
Plaintiff:
Andy Piucci
Defendant:
The Clorox Sales Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Davis v. Carr et al
as 1:2021cv02799
Plaintiff:
Zekemian Tyrone Davis
Defendant:
Michael Carr, Andy Pascuals, Daniel M. Coursey, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENDERSON v. MERCER et al
as 7:2021cv00053
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, DONALD BRYANT, JUDGE W LOUIS SANDS and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOWELL v. CROW et al
as 4:2021cv00067
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, MUSCOGEE CIRCUIT COURT and Warden JOHN CROW, III
Plaintiff:
ANDY NOWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOWELL v. CROW et al
as 4:2021cv00068
Respondent:
Warden JOHN CROW, III, MUSCOGEE CIRCUIT COURT and STATE OF GEORGIA
Petitioner:
ANDY NOWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Parker v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01033
Defendant:
Andy Gill, John Does 1-4, Eric Frazier and others
Plaintiff:
Shamar Dwight Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
The New Georgia Project et al v. Raffensperger et al
as 1:2020cv01986
Defendant:
Tim McFalls, John Mangano, Brad Raffensperger and others
Plaintiff:
Reagan Jennings, The New Georgia Project, Candace Woodall and others
Amicus Curiae:
Public Interest Legal Foundation and Landmark Legal Foundation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zachery v. Richie et al
as 3:2020cv00207
Defendant:
Walker, Captain Taylor, Sheriff Terry Langley and others
Plaintiff:
Rashad Zachery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neinstein LLP v. Simpson et al
as 1:2020cv04299
Defendant:
Andy Simpson and Digital Law Marketing, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Neinstein LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KELLEY v. BOSTICK et al
as 1:2020cv00187
Defendant:
NURSE MANDY BOSTICK, SHERIFF ANDY HESTER and SOUTHERN CORRECTIONAL MEDICINE
Plaintiff:
JASON KEITH KELLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
