Cases 21 - 30 of 7,329
Metler Tonnessen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 9:2024cv80578
Plaintiff:
Autumn Metler Tonnessen
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Lopez et al v. Brisas Enterprise, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Miguel Lopez Lopez and Carmen Delfina Perez Lopez
Defendant:
Brisas Enterprise, Inc. d/b/a Brisas Del Mar Restaurant and Martin Lopez Lopez
Edwards v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Javaughn Edwards
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
ROMANICK v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
PAUL SHANE ROMANICK
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Martin et al v. Ace Insurance Company of the Midwest
as 6:2024cv00825
Plaintiff:
Mark Martin and Kelli Martin
Defendant:
Ace Insurance Company of the Midwest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Shuford v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Brandon Denard Shuford
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Pardinas v. Martin Martin Renovations, Inc.
as 1:2024cv21682
Plaintiff:
Otto Pardinas
Defendant:
Martin Martin Renovations, Inc. d/b/a Bath Fitter
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Larue v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 0:2024cv60729
Plaintiff:
Tonya Larue
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Marlowe v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv00818
Plaintiff:
Faith M Marlowe
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
