Cases 21 - 30 of 160
Federal Trade Commission v. DK Automation LLC et al
as 1:2022cv23760
Defendant:
Kevin David Hulse, DK Automation LLC, AMZ Automation LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv10838
Plaintiff:
ARNETT CLEOTIS JOHNSON, JR.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Arnett et al v. American Security Insurance Company
as 5:2022cv00287
Plaintiff:
DAMON ARNETT and BRITTANY ARNETT
Defendant:
American Security Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Arnett v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv01532
Plaintiff:
Christopher Arnett
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETLY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv14020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Arnette et al
as 1:2021mc03955
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jennifer Arnette
Garnishee:
Piggly Wiggly
Arnett v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 7:2021cv01662
Plaintiff:
Roger Arnett
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv23798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
