Cases 21 - 30 of 325
Gresham v. Centurion et al
as 8:2023cv01704
Plaintiff:
Leroy Gresham
Defendant:
Centurion, Hardee CI Medical Department, APRN N Wishon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROOKS v. SMITH et al
as 4:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN J ROOKS
Defendant:
TOMMY SMITH, SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON CO., TERRY E. BAMARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joshua Franklin v. Robert Nicholson, et al
as 23-12397
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA FRANKLIN
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT W. NICHOLSON, Sergeant at Hamilton CI, JACKIE MORGAN, Sergeant at Hamilton CI and CHRISTOPHER J. ADAMS, Officer at Hamilton CI
David Stephens v. Columbia CI Warden
as 23-12131
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID TERRENCE STEPHENS
Defendant / Appellee:
COLUMBIA CI WARDEN
King Ocean Services Ltd. v. CI Mistic SAS Fruits and Vegetables, LLC
as 1:2023cv22227
Plaintiff:
King Ocean Services Ltd.
Defendant:
CI Mistic SAS Fruits and Vegetables, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty - Freight/Tariff Charges
v. MARTINEZ et al
as 4:2023cv00260
Defendant:
NELSON D MARTINEZ and HAMILTON CI ANNEX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jerry Means v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-11587
Petitioner / Appellant:
JERRY MEANS
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and OKALOOSA CI WARDEN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00717
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jimmy Kroft v. Charlotte CI Warden, et al
as 23-11168
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JIMMY LEE KROFT
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLOTTE CI WARDEN, JEFFREY ROBINSON, FNU DAWSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
