Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Gilley v. Cullman County District Attorney's Office et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv01251
Defendant: Cullman County District Attorney's Office and Blaylock C. Wilson
Plaintiff: Dale William Gilley, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Berryhill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00235
Plaintiff: Patrice Dale Williams
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
In re: Dale Gilley, Jr.
as 14-12273
Petitioner: In re: DALE WILLIAM GILLEY, JR.
Mandamus Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv23120
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Gilley v. Cullman County District Attorney's Office We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv01116
Plaintiff: Dale William Gilley, Jr
Defendant: Cullman County District Attorney's Office
Miscellaneou: staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilley v. Cullman County District Attorneys Office
as 4:2013cv00582
Plaintiff: Dale William Gilley, Jr
Defendant: Cullman County District Attorneys Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dale Gilley, Jr. v. Carter Davenport, et al
as 13-10371
Petitioner - Appellant: DALE WILLIAM GILLEY, JR.
Respondent - Appellee: CARTER DAVENPORT and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Gilley v. Davenport et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv03919
Petitioner: Dale William Gilley, Jr
Respondent: Carter Davenport and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gilley v. Hetzel et al
as 5:2011cv00767
Petitioner: Dale William Gilley
Respondent: Hetzel and Attorney General for the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?