Cases 21 - 30 of 164
Guthrie v. DeKalb County Jail
as 1:2022cv01537
Petitioner:
Wylie Lewis Guthrie
Respondent:
DeKalb County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. DeKalb County Jail
as 1:2022cv01375
Plaintiff:
Steven Carter
Defendant:
DeKalb County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkins v. DeKalb County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv00727
Plaintiff:
Darrell Rondey Wilkins
Defendant:
DeKalb County Jail, Sgt. Gannt, Inmate Housed in 7NW Cell 416 on June 11, 2021 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00647
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
DIARRA v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 5:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
MOUSSA DIARRA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and DEKALB COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DIARRA v. FOOD DRUG ADMINISTRATION et al
as 5:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
MOUSSA DIARRA
Defendant:
FOOD DRUG ADMINISTRATION, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Underwood v. Dekalb County Jail
as 1:2022cv00118
Plaintiff:
Travon De'Aundre Underwood
Defendant:
Dekalb County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice v. DeKalb County Jail et al
as 1:2021cv04852
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Mack Rice
Defendant:
DeKalb County Jail, Ms. Winston and Dr. Mendosa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Grady Memorial Hospital et al
as 1:2021cv04785
Plaintiff:
Brandon Jamal Smith
Defendant:
Grady Memorial Hospital and DeKalb County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Underwood v. DeKalb County Jail Staff
as 1:2021cv04764
Plaintiff:
Travon DeAundre Underwood
Defendant:
DeKalb County Jail Staff, Melody M. Maddox and Larandy Aikens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
