Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Ellis Evans v. M.L. Rivera
as 11-10483
Petitioner - Appellant:
ELLIS E. EVANS
Respondent - Appellee:
M. L. RIVERA, Warden
Evans v. Rivera
as 4:2010cv00292
Plaintiff:
Ellis E. Evans
Defendant:
M.L. Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hollingsworth Investments v. Evans, et al
as 8:2010cv02065
Plaintiff:
Hollingsworth Investments
Defendant:
Carl E. Evans and R. Evan Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Jackson County Jail et al
as 2:2010cv00167
Plaintiff:
Bob David Scott
Defendant:
Jackson County Jail, David Savage, Bob Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoke v. Jackson County Jail et al
as 2:2010cv00134
Plaintiff:
Stephen Ray Hoke
Defendant:
Jackson County Jail, Stan E Evans, Darell Savage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoke v. Jackson County Jail et al
as 5:2010cv00265
Plaintiff:
Stephen Ray Hoke
Defendant:
Jackson County Jail, Stan E Evans, Darell Savage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2009cv01827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Evans v. All Plastics Recycling, Inc. et al
as 8:2009cv01265
Plaintiff:
Christian E. Evans and Christian E. Evans
Defendant:
All Plastics Recycling, Inc. and Christopher J. Markey
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
DZ Bank AG Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank, Frankfurt Am Main, New York Branch v. Mark Evans & Sons Agency, LLC et al
as 8:2009cv01221
Plaintiff:
DZ Bank AG Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank, Frankfurt Am Main, New York Branch
Defendant:
Mark Evans & Sons Agency, LLC and Mark E. Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Covington v. Aramark, Inc. et al
as 8:2008cv01026
Plaintiff:
Arnold Covington
Defendant:
Aramark, Inc. and E. Evans
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
