Cases 21 - 30 of 95
James et al v. FCC Coleman USP 1
as 5:2021cv00003
Plaintiff:
Donald Hairston, Timmarcus Cole, Calvin B. James and others
Defendant:
FCC Coleman USP 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HAIRSTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv07498
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARQUES HAIRSTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hairston v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00930
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Hairston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HAIRSTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv00419
Plaintiff:
KEVIN HAIRSTON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAIRSTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv96177
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HAIRSTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hairston Woods, et al v. Christopher Murphy
as 20-13543
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SURESTE PROPERTY SERVICES and HAIRSTON WOODS
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MURPHY
HAIRSTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv92940
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE HAIRSTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAIRSTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv89075
Plaintiff:
TRELLIS HAIRSTON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hairston Woods, et al v. Christopher Murphy
as 20-13151
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SURESTE PROPERTY SERVICES and HAIRSTON WOODS
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MURPHY, and all other occupants
HAIRSTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv73711
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
YAVERGINA TEIKO-YAMADA HAIRSTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
