Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 89
Jamil Al-Amin v. Hugh Smith, et al
as 10-90003
Petitioner: JAMIL AL-AMIN
Respondent: HUGH SMITH and SANCHE M. MARTIN
LUCHIE v. SMITH We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00003
Petitioner: TYRONE LUCHIE
Respondent: Hugh Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Adams-Wilborn v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv00021
Plaintiff: Jackie Adams-Wilborn
Defendant: Georgia Department of Corrections, Johnny Sikes, Hilton Hall and others
Battle v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv03399
Petitioner: Larry Battle
Respondent: Hugh Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Banks v. Baker et al
as 1:2009cv02912
Petitioner: Leroy Banks
Respondent: Thurbert Baker, Brian Owens, Chris Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lightfoot v. Donald et al
as 6:2009cv00050
Plaintiff: Andre D. Lightfoot
Defendant: James E. Donald, Shevondah Fields, Tom Sittnick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Smith
as 1:2009cv01800
Petitioner: William Robert Wilson, Jr.
Respondent: Hugh Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Esquivel v. Smith
as 1:2009cv01616
Petitioner: Rodolfo Esquivel
Respondent: Hugh Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Smith
as 1:2009cv01442
Petitioner: Eric James Smith
Respondent: Hugh Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Smith et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00051
Petitioner: Samuel Nathaniel Bailey
Respondent: Hugh Smith and Thurbert E. Baker
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?