Cases 21 - 30 of 172
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00764
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00763
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv21893
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Wurth USA, Inc. v. Thompson et al
as 6:2022cv00602
Plaintiff:
Wurth USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Michelle Thompson, John Does 1-10, Jane Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Mohon v. Agentra LLC et al
as 2:2022mc14111
Plaintiff:
Barbara Mohon
Defendant:
Agentra LLC, TracyAnn Nicole Hamilton and Jane Does 1-10
BAYSE v. WARD et al
as 1:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
ROBBIN AMANDA BAYSE and Robert Bayse
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Dr. Sharon Lewis, JAVEL JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wurth USA, Inc. v. Spetalnick et al
as 1:2022cv01204
Plaintiff:
Wurth USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Andrew Spetalnick, John Does 1-10, Jane Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-10623
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
CLEVELAND v. MACON MEMORIAL PARK et al
as 5:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
CARLA CLEVELAND
Defendant:
MACON MEMORIAL PARK doing business as MACON MEMORIAL PARK CEMETERY #06232, SCI SHARED SERVICES INC and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BAYSE v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00086
Plaintiff:
ROBBIN AMANDA BAYSE and ROBERT BAYSE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, MEDICAL DIRECTOR SHARON LEWIS, DIRECTOR JAVEL JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
