Cases 21 - 30 of 575
LaBorde v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Loclyn LaBorde
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration and United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Archambault v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv24182
Plaintiff:
Ryan Archambault
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Kever v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00626
Plaintiff:
Tamra Michelle Kever
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
LANTIGUA v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00258
Plaintiff:
YANITA LANTIGUA and YANIRA LANTIGUA
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Murray v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2023cv02422
Plaintiff:
Nicholas John Murray
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Guadagno v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv14322
Plaintiff:
Iris Guadagno
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
DEMING v. KIJAKAZI
as 3:2023cv24650
Plaintiff:
STEVEN THOMAS DEMING
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Prater v. Acting Commissioner of Social Security
as 9:2023cv81398
Plaintiff:
Allen K Prater
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Williams v. Kijakazi (CONSENT)
as 1:2023cv00609
Plaintiff:
Terria Denise Williams
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jones, Jr. v. Kijakazi
as 0:2023cv61960
Plaintiff:
Willie Lee Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
