Cases 21 - 30 of 33
SANDERS et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03079
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BESSON, DUSTIN LEDOUX, CHRISTOPHER PROSPERIE and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. Thomas LaFleur
as 16-17135
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS ISAAC LAFLEUR
Gibson et al v. Credit Suisse, AG et al
as 1:2015mc23150
Plaintiff:
L. J. Gibson, Beau Blixseth, Amy Koenig and others
Defendant:
Credit Suisse, AG, Credit Suisse Securities (USA), LLC, Credit Suisse First Boston and others
Movant:
ERG Enterprises, LP
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv01838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-14967
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: Hollice LaFleur
as 13-13022
Petitioner:
In re: HOLLICE LAFLEUR
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv02315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lafleur v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2009cv03498
Plaintiff:
Michael Lafleur
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO
Lafleur v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2009mi00524
Plaintiff:
Michael Lafleur
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Type:
Other Statutes
Lafleur v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2009cv02406
Plaintiff:
Michael Lafleur
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
