Cases 21 - 29 of 29
SULLIVAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv80460
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SULLIVAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WELANDER et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03330
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN WAGASKY, JASON TYGER, RYAN WARD and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Seymore v. Sullivan et al
as 6:2019cv00650
Defendant:
Michael Sullivan, Stasia Warren, Florida Department of Revenue Title IV-D and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip M. Seymore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sullivan v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 1:2018cv23358
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Plaintiff:
Michael Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
MICHAEL SULLIVAN v. NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION et al
as 3:2013cv00397
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SULLIVAN
Defendant:
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION, NORTHROP GRUMMAN SHIP SYSTEMS, NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Chavez v. A B C Drywall, Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv24550
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Chavez
Defendant:
A B C Drywall, Corporation and Michael Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Analytix Data Services, LLC v. New Castle Consulting, LLC et al
as 0:2009cv60967
Plaintiff:
Analytix Data Services, LLC, Analytix Data Services, LLC and Analytix Data Services, LLC
Defendant:
New Castle Consulting, LLC, Michael Sullivan, Pratapreddy Bhimireddy and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv00309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2009cv00365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
