Cases 21 - 30 of 148
Saahir v. United States of America et al
as 6:2022cv00612
Plaintiff:
Subutiya Saahir
Defendant:
United States of America, Orange County Sheriff's Office, AT&T and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vinodh Raghubir v. USA, et al
as 22-10393
Petitioner / Appellant:
VINODH RAGHUBIR
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF FLORIDA, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Vinodh Raghubir v. US District Court Eastern NY, et al
as 21-14517
Petitioner / Appellant:
VINODH RAGHUBIR
Respondent / Appellee:
US DISTRICT COURT EASTERN NY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Vinodh Raghubir v. USA, et al
as 21-14332
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VINODH RAGHUBIR
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF FLORIDA, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
LaCount v. Gonzalez et al
as 6:2021cv01877
Plaintiff:
Damien M. LaCount
Defendant:
Chelsea Gonzalez and Orange County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LaCount v. Mendoza et al
as 6:2021cv01878
Plaintiff:
Damien M. LaCount
Defendant:
Angel Mendoza, Arthur Sheppard, Orange County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vinodh Raghubir v. USA, et al
as 21-14138
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VINODH RAGHUBIR
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF FLORIDA, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Lane v. Lane et al
as 6:2021cv01934
Plaintiff:
Gregory R. Lane
Defendant:
Rayfield Lane, Mitchell R. Lane, Melody Y. Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raghubir v. United States of America et al
as 6:2021cv01564
Plaintiff:
Vinodh Raghubir
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Florida, US Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
St. Vil v. Tyler et al
as 6:2021cv01753
Plaintiff:
Wingly St. Vil, Wingly Saint Vil and Wingly StVil
Defendant:
Howard Tyler and Orange County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
