Cases 21 - 30 of 267
Ponce v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LLC
as 1:2023cv22587
Plaintiff:
Belkys De Los Angeles Ponce
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Ponce v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
as 8:2023cv01520
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Ponce
Defendant:
Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
PONCE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv17876
Plaintiff:
RENEE PONCE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv22413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Pena-Ponce v. Jenkins
as 1:2023cv02837
Petitioner:
Victor Pena-Ponce
Respondent:
Warden Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
LIZAMA DE PONCE v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 1:2023cv22320
Plaintiff:
SEMIDA LIZAMA DE PONCE
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
PONCE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13480
Plaintiff:
RACHEL PONCE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
GONZALEZ v. SMOOTHIE KING CO, INC et al
as 1:2023cv21751
Plaintiff:
JESUS GONZALEZ
Defendant:
SMOOTHIE KING CO, INC doing business as d/b/a Smoothie King #1120 and PONCE REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS LLC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
PONCE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv09558
Plaintiff:
OMAR PONCE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
