Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,650
Enedina Ramirez-Lopez, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 24-11249
Petitioner: ENEDINA LISET RAMIREZ-LOPEZ and KIMBERLY MAYDALY CHAVEZ-RAMIREZ
Respondent: U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00914
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Ramirez v. Baulding et al
as 4:2024cv00054
Plaintiff: Pablo Ramirez
Defendant: Sharikka Baulding, United States of America, United States Postal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
CASTILLO v. GABBY
as 5:2024cv00055
Petitioner: PEDRO RAMIREZ CASTILLO, JR
Respondent: JOHN GABBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Battle, Leon v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv20560
Plaintiff: Leon Battle
Defendant: Glenn P. Miller, James Banks, Omar Baez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00655
Plaintiff: Jonathan M. Ramirez
Defendant: Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Declaratory Judgment
Type: Contract Insurance
Ramirez v. Grillo Medina et al
as 1:2024cv20190
Plaintiff: Laura Ramirez
Defendant: Johan Augusto Grillo Medina, Kevin Johan Grillo Alonso and GRILLOSFREE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Erica Ramirez v. SNAPMEDTECH, INC.
as 24-90002
Petitioner: ERICA RAMIREZ
Respondent: SNAPMEDTECH, INC.
Not Yet Classified: SERVICE
Wescott v. Ramirez Sing et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv02494
Plaintiff: Carl A. Wescott
Defendant: Wendy Patricia Ramirez Sing and Does 1 through 25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
USA v. Alieski Ramirez
as 24-10485
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ALIESKI CRUZ RAMIREZ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?