Cases 21 - 30 of 356
ROSEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv62665
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY ROSEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burns v. Mina et al
as 6:2021cv01546
Plaintiff:
David S Burns
Defendant:
RAG HOLDING INTERNATIONAL LLC d/b/a HILTON HAMPTON INN AND SUITES INTERNATIONAL DRIVE, Naples Hotel Group, LLC, STEVEN DOUGHERTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Choy v. Rosen
as 1:2021cv22655
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Choy
Defendant:
Wayne Rosen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv23384
Plaintiff:
SHAWN ROSEN
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02079
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rosen v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01709
Defendant:
Teva Women's Health Inc doing business as Teva Women's Health LLC, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc, Teva Women's Health LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Rachel Rosen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01472
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Robert Modrall v. William Barr, et al
as 21-10727
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF SESSIONS, WILLIAM BARR, JEFFERY ROSEN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT G. MODRALL and ROBERT GREGORY MODRALL
v. Leonard et al
as 8:2021cv00447
Defendant:
Renee Leonard, Pollack and Rosen, P.A. doing business as Pollack & Rosen, P.A. and Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rosen et al v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00787
Defendant:
Daimler AG and Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Rosen, Tamer Nassar and Reginald St. Jean
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
