Cases 21 - 30 of 7,757
Bradley v. Ivey
as 6:2024cv00779
Petitioner:
Steven Patrick Bradley
Respondent:
Warden, Brevard County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hoglan et al v. M/V Bluefins, IMO Number 922657 et al
as 1:2024mc21628
Plaintiff:
Ju-Hsiu Jian, Jason Ruben Moreno, Christian B Stallworth and others
Defendant:
M/V Bluefins, IMO Number 922657, M/V Boceanica, IMO Number 9267132, M/V B Luminosa, IMO Number 9256016 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Aubrey v. Fry et al
as 0:2024cv60701
Plaintiff:
Steven Benton Aubrey
Defendant:
John D Fry, Brian D Fillingim and Glen A Fitzmartin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Hart v. Merryday
as 8:2024cv01004
Plaintiff:
Randy A. Hart
Defendant:
Steven Merryday
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Epperson v. The Hertz Corporation
as 2:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Steven Epperson
Defendant:
The Hertz Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Smith v. Lieberman et al
as 1:2024cv21558
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lee Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Steven Lieberman and MDC Childrens Courthouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cruz, Francisco v. Yermish et al
as 1:2024cv21549
Plaintiff:
Francisco Rodriguez Cruz and Francisco Rodriguez-Cruz
Defendant:
Steven Yermish and Martin Public Defender Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RMK Merrill Stevens, LLC v. M/Y Ocean Drive et al
as 1:2024cv21441
Plaintiff:
RMK Merrill Stevens, LLC
Defendant:
M/Y Ocean Drive and JUST FUNKY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Stevens v. LaMarca
as 0:2024cv60623
Plaintiff:
Timothy "Chaz" Stevens
Defendant:
Chip LaMarca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stuart v. Glass
as 8:2024cv00928
Plaintiff:
Steven Stuart
Defendant:
Mark Glass
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
