Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Heard v. Mann et al
as 1:2018cv03338
Plaintiff:
Bryan Cortez Heard
Defendant:
DeKalb Co. Sheriff's Dept., Trinity Services Group, Inc. and Sheriff Jeffrey Mann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MENDOZA v. JONES et al
as 4:2018cv00066
Plaintiff:
GEORGE RICHARD MENDOZA
Defendant:
JULIE JONES, ACCESS CORRECTIONS, TRINITY SERVICES GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jack v. Mann et al
as 1:2017cv05488
Plaintiff:
Jaiyeola Jack
Defendant:
Jeffery E. Mann, Trinity Services Group, Inc. and Dekalb County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard v. Mann et al
as 1:2017cv04970
Plaintiff:
Bryan Cortez Heard
Defendant:
Jeffrey Mann and Trinity Services Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reutter v. Trinity Services Group, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv01730
Plaintiff:
David M.. Reutter
Defendant:
Trinity Services Group, Inc., Union Supply Group, Inc. and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reutter v. Trinity Services Group, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv00349
Plaintiff:
David M. Reutter
Defendant:
Trinity Services Group, Inc., Union Supply Group, Inc. and Julie Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valme v. Trinity Services Group, Inc. et al
as 0:2017cv60188
Plaintiff:
Serge Valme
Defendant:
Trinity Services Group, Inc. and Larry G. Vaughn
Mediator:
Louis P. Pfeffer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Glover v. Trinity Services Group, Inc.
as 8:2016cv00355
Plaintiff:
Lurana Glover
Defendant:
Trinity Services Group, Inc.
Mediator:
Mark Hanley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Saltzman v. Swanson Services Corporation et al
as 9:2016cv80137
Plaintiff:
Lance Saltzman
Defendant:
Swanson Services Corporation and Trinity Services Group Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Vandyke v. Sheriff of Palm Beach County, et al
as 15-15131
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN WILLIAM VANDYKE
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERIFF OF PALM BEACH COUNTY and TRINITY SERVICES GROUP, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
