Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Dickinson et al v. The Terminix International Company, LP et al
as 1:2013cv00631
Plaintiff:
Scott Dickinson and Melissa Dickinson
Defendant:
The Terminix International Company, LP , Terminix International, Inc. and Ken Stroh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aust et al v. The Terminix International Company, LP et al
as 1:2013cv00629
Plaintiff:
Jerold Aust and Mary Anne Aust
Defendant:
The Terminix International Company, LP , Terminix International, Inc. and Ken Stroh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Strul v. Terminix International Company Limited Partnership et al
as 8:2012cv01209
Plaintiff:
Rolando J. Strul
Defendant:
Terminix International Company Limited Partnership and Terminix International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2009cv01890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal - Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Monroe et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv00626
Plaintiff:
Mark Monroe, Mark Monroe, Carla Monroe and others
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, First Preston Management, Inc., Terminix International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Disability Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
