Cases 31 - 40 of 1,132
WOODS v. WEST et al
as 4:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
FABIAN WOODS, JR
Defendant:
LT ADRIAN WEST, Deputy Warden LETITIA BURKS, ANTHONY ANTONIO HAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAULCIN v. DIXON et al
as 3:2023cv24711
Plaintiff:
PROPHET PAULCIN
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, GEO, G ENGLISH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURKE v. SALES
as 5:2023cv00458
Petitioner:
WILLIAM BURKE
Defendant:
WARDEN TIMOTHY SALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burk v. Catoosa County Superior Court
as 4:2023cv00264
Plaintiff:
Arnold Cordell Burk
Defendant:
Catoosa County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timothy Burke v. USA
as 23-13649
Petitioner / Appellant:
TIMOTHY BURKE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Fambra v. Doe et al
as 4:2023cv00251
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Fambra
Defendant:
John Doe and Dr. Richard Burke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv32731
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BURK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BURKE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv32479
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN BURKE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BURKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv33903
Plaintiff:
JASON BURKS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BURKE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv26811
Plaintiff:
LEONARD BURKE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
