Cases 31 - 40 of 261
AHMAD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22065
Plaintiff:
NASIR AHMAD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GS Holistic, LLC v. MR THEEB LLC et al
as 2:2022cv14366
Plaintiff:
GS Holistic, LLC
Defendant:
Mr. Theeb LLC doing business as Mr. Smoke (2835) and AHMAD THEEB
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
GS Holistic, LLC v. MR THEEB LLC et al
as 2:2022cv14365
Plaintiff:
GS Holistic, LLC
Defendant:
MR THEEB LLC doing business as MR. SMOKE (303) and AHMAD THEEB
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Rashidi et al v. Rashidi et al
as 1:2022cv04131
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Rashidi and Logistik Service
Defendant:
Patricia Rashidi, Carl Dauphin and Global Inter Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20526
Plaintiff:
TRE AHMAD SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Daker v. Dozier et al
as 6:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Homer Bryson, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00340
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, FACILITIES DIRECTOR JACK KOON, JOHNNY SIKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00343
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, AHMAD HOLT, CLAY NIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, GREGORY DOZIER, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
