Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Nino v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2013cv00594
Plaintiff:
Fernando Nino
Defendant:
William Bechtold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv02731
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Eye v. Bechtold
as 5:2013cv00374
Plaintiff:
David Eye
Defendant:
William Bechtold and Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
ROYSTER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC et al. v. BP EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION INC et al.
as 3:2013cv00245
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY L MIMS, AARON YOUNG, EMORY CAREY and others
Defendant:
BP CORPORATION NORTH AMERICA INC, HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, BP PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Eye v. Bechtold
as 0:2013cv60872
Plaintiff:
David Eye
Defendant:
William Bechtold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Flint v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2013cv00267
Petitioner:
Lorenzo E. Flint, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Georgia and W. Bechtold
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv02936
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv02925
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv02568
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jeremy Pinson v. J. Grimes, et al
as 12-10182
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY PINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
J. GRIMES, Senior Officer, R. MCCOLLOUGH, Lieutenant, L. WILLIAMS, Deputy Captain and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
