Cases 31 - 40 of 194
MCELROY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04397
Plaintiff:
COLBY MCELROY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
COLLINS-ENGLE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03785
Plaintiff:
COLBY DILLON COLLINS-ENGLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BALDWIN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03549
Plaintiff:
COLBY BALDWIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Perry et al v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Colby Perry and Morgan Perry
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and Scottsdale Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
OKERLUND v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20455
Plaintiff:
COLBY GERALD OKERLUND
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WAKEFIELD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20138
Plaintiff:
COLBY DALLAS WAKEFIELD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
NOHR v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18983
Plaintiff:
COLBY JOSEPH NOHR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Conologue v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC
as 8:2022cv02131
Plaintiff:
Colby Conologue
Defendant:
Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC
Not Classified By Court:
Gregory P. Holder
Barron v. Farabee et al
as 1:2022cv03265
Plaintiff:
Ricky Eugene Barron
Defendant:
Cliff Farabee, Sheriff Don E. Thurman and Chris Colby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America for the use and benefit of Colby Enterprises, Inc. v. TDX Quality, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the use and benefit of Colby Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
TDX Quality, LLC and Fidelity And Deposit Company Of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
