Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
NEMCOVA et al v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 5:2010cv00019
Plaintiff:
RENATA NEMCOVA and TOMAS TKADLECEK
Defendant:
JANET NAPOLITANO, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, DAVID ROARK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv00270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv03112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv03075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(2) Injunction for Deportation
Devanjali Inc. et al v. Roark et al
as 8:2009cv01928
Plaintiff:
Devanjali Inc. and Vijaykumar B. Patel
Defendant:
David Roark, Alejandor Mayorkas and Secretary, Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Abdalla v. Napolitano et al
as 6:2009cv00273
Plaintiff:
Ammar Abdalla
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano, Director of Citizenship and Immigration Services and David Roark
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
JIANG v. AYTES et al
as 1:2009cv00016
Plaintiff:
ZHIHUA JIANG
Defendant:
MICHAEL AYTES and DAVID ROARK
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Castano v. Chertoff et al
as 6:2008cv02116
Plaintiff:
Carlos Andres Castano
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, David Roark, Jonathan Scharfen and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
