Cases 31 - 40 of 84
PATTON et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03326
Plaintiff:
TERRY YOUTSEY, NEALSON FOSTER, CYRUS MCCOY and others
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HARRIS v. FLORIDA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2019cv00339
Defendant:
DANYELES, C BROWN, MARK INCH and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Firstkey Homes, LLC A/A/F Cerberus SFR Holdings, LP v. Harris et al
as 1:2018cv04552
Defendant:
Gregory Harris and Connie Connor
Plaintiff:
Firstkey Homes, LLC A/A/F Cerberus SFR Holdings, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
In re: Gregory Harris
as 18-12924
Petitioner:
In re: GREGORY HARRIS
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
HARRIS v. SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2017cv23455
Defendant:
State of Florida and Secretary Florida Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Gregory Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HARRIS v. SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2017cv00405
Petitioner:
GREGORY HARRIS
Respondent:
SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: Gregory Harris
as 17-13785
Petitioner:
In re: GREGORY HARRIS
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Gregory Harris v. Secretary, Florida Department
as 17-13487
Petitioner - Appellant:
GREGORY HARRIS
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN A. BARFIELD and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Gregory Harris v. USA, et al
as 17-13246
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF FLORIDA, DADE COUNTY and others
HARRIS v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2017cv00298
Plaintiff:
GREGORY HARRIS
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
