Cases 31 - 40 of 433
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS INC v. DEBRA ENTERPRISES LLC et al
as 5:2021cv00426
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS INC
Defendant:
DEBRA ENTERPRISES LLC doing business as GAME-ON SPORTS CAFE and JAMES W DEBONA
Parcher v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2021cv01904
Petitioner:
James W. Parcher
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harriman v. Wellpath, LLC
as 8:2021cv02479
Plaintiff:
James W. Harriman and James Walter Harriman
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oppenheimer v. Hicks et al
as 1:2021cv00465
Plaintiff:
David Oppenheimer
Defendant:
James W. Hicks, Lacey Hicks, Hicks Properties, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Oppenheimer v. Hicks et al
as 1:2021cv00464
Plaintiff:
David Oppenheimer
Defendant:
James W. Hicks, Lacey Hicks and Hicks Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
PENDERGRAPH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv63492
Plaintiff:
JAMES W PENDERGRAPH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCOLLEM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv64019
Plaintiff:
JAMES W MCCOLLEM
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stanley v. Chubb National Insurance Companay
as 9:2021cv81909
Plaintiff:
James Stanley and James W Stanley
Defendant:
Chubb National Insurance Companay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SIBLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv59698
Plaintiff:
JAMES W SIBLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harriman et al v. Nocco
as 8:2021cv02310
Petitioner:
James W. Harriman, Christopher C. Capshaw and James Walter Harriman
Defendant:
Christopher Nocco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
