Cases 31 - 40 of 400
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, GREGORY DOZIER, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SMITH et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv09743
Plaintiff:
JOHN L SMITH and ALAINA SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lawrence Brannen v. William Smith
as 22-12268
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAWRENCE ANTHONY BRANNEN
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM L. SMITH, Individual and Official Capacity
In re: Danny Smith
as 22-12236
Petitioner:
In re: DANNY L. SMITH
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv07561
Plaintiff:
SCOTT L SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ballard vs. Sprayberry, et al.
as 4:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Rico Lamar Ballard
Defendant:
Warden Kelvin Sprayberry, Deputy Warden Jones, Deputy Warden Alise Hammock-Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Smith
as 1:2022cv02217
Petitioner:
Robert L. Smith
Respondent:
Warden, Dooly State Prison and Amie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv06481
Plaintiff:
ANDRE L SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
