Cases 31 - 40 of 220
ARC WOOD & TIMBERS LLC v RIVERWOOD FLOORING & PANELING INC et al
as 1:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Arc Wood & Timbers, LLC and ARC WOOD & TIMBERS LLC
Defendant:
Riverwood Flooring & Paneling, Inc., Keith Lacy, RIVERWOOD FLOORING & PANELING INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. Harris et al
as 1:2021cv00519
Plaintiff:
Anthony Harris
Defendant:
Daniel Harris, Lacie McCall and Michell Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Eagle Eye Protection, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04447
Plaintiff:
Paula Murphy
Defendant:
Eagle Eye Protection, Inc. and Lacy E. Wright, III
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
LACY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv53781
Plaintiff:
STEVEN RAY LACY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cudnohufsky et al v. Apple Inc
as 5:2021cv00975
Plaintiff:
Lorrie Cudnohufsky, Darina Wynette Beasley, Marina Bromley and others
Defendant:
Apple Inc
Orso v. Lacy
as 8:2021mc00103
Plaintiff:
Matthew E. Orso as successor trustee to Kenneth D. Bell in his capacity as court-appointed receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC doing business as Zeekrewards.com
Defendant:
Keith Lacy
Interested Party:
Nationwide Judgment Recovery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
HIATT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv29684
Plaintiff:
LACIE HIATT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LACY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv24369
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DON LACY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Angelia Lacy v. City of Huntsville Alabama
as 21-11410
Defendant / Appellee:
HUNTSVILLE, CITY OF
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGELIA LACY
HANNON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv23348
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LACY HANNON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
