Cases 31 - 40 of 162
IN RE EQUIFAX, INC. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
as 1:2018cv00477
Plaintiff:
George Assad
Defendant:
Richard F. Smith, John W. Gamble, Jr., John J. Kelley, III and others
Movant:
Michael Hartleib
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IN RE EQUIFAX, INC. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
as 1:2018cv00317
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Bax , George Assad , Nancy A.K. Weyl and others
Defendant:
Richard F. Smith, John W. Gamble, Jr., John J. Kelley, III and others
Movant:
Teamsters Local 443 Health Services & Insurance Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Brevard County Jail
as 6:2017cv02207
Petitioner:
Richard Jerome Smith
Respondent:
Brevard County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart et al v. Equifax Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv05451
Plaintiff:
James Stewart and Eileen Stewart
Defendant:
Equifax Inc, Richard F. Smith, Jeff Dodge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROSENBLATT v. EXACTECH INC et al
as 1:2017cv00312
Defendant:
Albert H Burstein, David W. Petty, EXACTECH INC and others
Plaintiff:
Jordan Rosenblatt
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Block v. Equifax, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv05341
Plaintiff:
Carson Block
Defendant:
Equifax Inc , Richard F. Smith , Susan Mauldin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Brevard County Jail
as 6:2017cv02180
Plaintiff:
Richard Jerome Smith
Defendant:
Brevard County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Brevard County Jail Complex
as 6:2017cv02176
Plaintiff:
Richard Jerome Smith
Defendant:
Brevard County Jail Complex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAPPALARDO v. EXACTECH INC et al
as 1:2017cv00303
Defendant:
Richard C Smith, EXACTECH INC, David W Petty and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony PAPPALARDO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Smith v. Brevard County Jail
as 2:2017cv14416
Plaintiff:
Richard Jerome Smith
Defendant:
Brevard County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
