Cases 31 - 40 of 1,329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
GERMAN v. DIXON et al
as 4:2023cv00516
Plaintiff:
DARYL LENARD GERMAN
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, RON DESANTIS, ASHLEY MOODY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina v. Obama et al
as 3:2023cv01415
Plaintiff:
Derek Vernon Medina
Defendant:
Barack Hussein Obama, Donald John Trump, Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caicedo et al v. DeSantis
as 6:2023cv02303
Plaintiff:
David Caicedo, Rajib Chowdhury and Florida Rising Together, Inc.
Defendant:
Ron DeSantis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MICHAEL v. DESANTIS
as 4:2023cv00506
Plaintiff:
LINDA MICHAEL
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Christine Scott
as 23-13411
Petitioner:
In re: CHRISTINE SCOTT
Respondent:
GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, JIMMY PATRONIS and others
Prosky v. Omnibuys LLC
as 1:2023cv23914
Plaintiff:
Ron Prosky
Defendant:
Omnibuys LLC doing business as Scaling with Systems
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
HANNER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv32911
Plaintiff:
RON HANNER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ALBERT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv31618
Plaintiff:
RON ALBERT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv29870
Plaintiff:
RON MILLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
