Cases 31 - 40 of 74
GUTIERREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv04151
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
VICTOR M. GUTIERREZ, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARROQUIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv22072
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
VICTOR M MARROQUIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAMPILLO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv19910
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
VICTOR M CAMPILLO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MELNICHUK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv00470
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
VICTOR M MELNICHUK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GIBSON v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03245
Plaintiff:
CECIL GILBERT, DARIUS HART, DEVONTE SHEROD HARRIS and others
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Poole v. Samson et al
as 9:2019cv80629
Defendant:
Victor M. Rosado, FNU Kirsche, FNU Pierce and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Poole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv14442
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-11270
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Diaz v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 3:2017cv01225
Petitioner:
Victor M. Diaz
Respondent:
Secretary of D.O.C. and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Diaz v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 9:2017cv81065
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Secretary of D.O.C.
Plaintiff:
Victor M. Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
