Cases 31 - 40 of 149
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
YANG v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01166
Plaintiff:
RICK VA YANG
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
YANG v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
CHIAWEN YANG
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Chen et al v. Wow Restaurant TH, LLC et al
as 8:2022cv02774
Plaintiff:
Yanhong Chen and Lutong Yang
Defendant:
Wow Restaurant TH, LLC, Trinh Huynh and Wow Restaurant TH, LLC doing business as Yaki Sushi Grill BBQ
Not Classified By Court:
Carlos J. Burruezo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
YANG v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23593
Plaintiff:
MOUA YANG
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
YANG v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv21101
Plaintiff:
DAVID YANG
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Yang v. Nissan et al
as 1:2022cv04078
Plaintiff:
Yu Chieh Yang
Defendant:
Mike Rezi Nissan doing business as TT of Dekalb, Inc. and Automotive Management Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
YANG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv10626
Plaintiff:
DEVON RILEY YANG
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
YANG v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv08182
Plaintiff:
PHIA NENG YANG
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
