Cases 41 - 50 of 216
LAYTON v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2020cv00188
Defendant:
DARREN JACKSON, SHAWN EMMONS, BRANDON SHARPE and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BRADFORD LAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharpe v. Caldwell et al
as 1:2020cv03672
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of Georgia and Antoine Caldwell
Petitioner:
Montrell Sharpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCoy v. Bobbitt et al
as 6:2020cv00083
Defendant:
Stan Shapard, Robert Toole, Jean's Doe's and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Bernard McCoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Honeycutt v. Mikell et al
as 6:2020cv00068
Defendant:
Mr. Javaka Johnson, Mr. Marcus Mikell, Ms. Juanita Sharpe and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Honeycutt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raker v. Coleman et al
as 1:2020cv02231
Respondent:
Jackie Fulford, Timothy Carr, Georgia Dept of Corrections and others
Petitioner:
Dustin H. Raker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Raker v. Coleman et al
as 4:2020cv00114
Respondent:
Jackie Fulford, Timothy Carr, Georgia Dept of Corrections and others
Petitioner:
Dustin H. Raker
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LESLIE v. WARD et al
as 7:2020cv00079
Defendant:
Lt MCDOUGLE, HEATHER A DAVIS, Warden SHAWN EMMONS and others
Plaintiff:
EUGENE KYEVONNIE LESLIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharpe v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01633
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Denise Sharpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GLENN v. DOZIER et al
as 6:2020cv00040
Defendant:
Warden Marty Allen, Commissioner Greg Dozier, Howard and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH GLENN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharpe v. MBR Transport, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00074
Defendant:
John Does 1-5, Bronislaw Rudny and MBR Transport, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Alvin Sharpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
