Cases 41 - 50 of 119
Ortiz Torres v. Warden et al
as 1:2020cv22852
Defendant:
Sgt. A. Gustton, Medical Private Company / Century I, Assistant Warden and others
Plaintiff:
Jose D Ortiz Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramos v. Inch et al
as 8:2020cv01543
Defendant:
Dr. Ronald Solorzano, Mark Inch, Michelle Schouest and others
Plaintiff:
Alain Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARPER v. WARDEN et al
as 4:2020cv00259
Defendant:
WARDEN, CONYERS, ASSISTANT WARDEN and others
Plaintiff:
REGINALD HARPER, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickett v. Colon et al
as 1:2020cv21565
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Corrales, Dr. Papillon, Colonel Green and others
Plaintiff:
Cassius Pickett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Charlotte Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2020cv00198
Defendant:
Charlotte Correctional Institution Correctional Officers, Warden, Assistant Warden and others
Plaintiff:
Toddrick O. Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Bermudez et al
as 1:2020cv20391
Defendant:
Psychiatrist Media, Psychiatrist Driliani, Regional Director Reid and others
Plaintiff:
Gaynett Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Casey v. Inch et al
as 1:2019cv24819
Defendant:
Assistant Warden A. Martinez and Secretary Mark Inch
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Casey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCGHEE v. WARDEN et al
as 5:2019cv00408
Defendant:
UNICOR PLANT MANAGER, ASSISTANT WARDEN, WARDEN and others
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS MCGHEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riess v. Secretary of Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv23996
Defendant:
Major Smith, Officer Love, Officer McKinney and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Riess
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sadler v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 1:2019cv23871
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ray Sadler and Salah-Aladin-Yussuf-JBN-Ayvub
Defendant:
Moore, Assistant Director, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
