Cases 41 - 50 of 755
Bowen v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 6:2023cv00578
Plaintiff:
Joshua Bowen
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
DOWNEY UNITED SCHOOL DISTRICT v. JUUL LABS INC, et al
as 3:2023cv16856
Defendant:
JUUL LABS INC, PAX LABS INC and PLOOM INC, ALTRIA GROUP INC and others
Plaintiff:
DOWNEY UNITED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO)
Bowen v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
as 6:2023cv00874
Plaintiff:
Edward Bowen
Defendant:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BOWEN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv14601
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BOWEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BOWEN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv14695
Plaintiff:
RANDALL JOHN BOWEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BOWEN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13589
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BOWEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10254
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JOHNSON, SETH LACROIX, IVAN MAY and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WHITTENBURG v. OLIVER et al
as 4:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HOYT WHITTENBURG
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver and Tommy Bowen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bowen et al v. Shore Excursion Group, LLC et al
as 0:2023cv60585
Plaintiff:
Kelli Bowen and Larry Bowen
Defendant:
Shore Excursion Group, LLC, Swiss Travel Limited Corp. and Brisas de la Jungla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Whittenburg v. Oliver et al
as 4:2023cv00048
Petitioner:
William Hoyt Whittenburg
Respondent:
Tyrone Oliver and Tommy Bowen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
