Cases 41 - 50 of 108
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv61568
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Mack v. City of Fort Lauderdale
as 0:2018cv61068
Plaintiff:
Joy Mack
Defendant:
City of Fort Lauderdale, City of Fort Lauderdale Police Department, City of Hollywood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv62514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
City of Hollywood Police Officers' Retirement System v. HD Supply Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02587
Plaintiff:
City of Hollywood Police Officers' Retirement System
Defendant:
HD Supply Holdings, Inc. , Joseph J. Deangelo and Evan J. Levitt
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Forbes v. City of Hollywood et al
as 0:2017cv60444
Plaintiff:
Scott Forbes
Defendant:
City of Hollywood and Ronald Cannella
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rocket Outdoor Advertising, LLC v. City of Hollywood, Florida
as 0:2017cv60074
Plaintiff:
Rocket Outdoor Advertising, LLC
Defendant:
City of Hollywood, Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Livingston Manners v. Ronald Cannella, et al
as 17-10088
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LIVINGSTON MANNERS
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD CANNELLA, individually, KARRIE SABILLON, individually and CITY OF HOLLYWOOD, FLORIDA
Rhodes v. City of Hollywood Florida et al
as 0:2016cv62578
Plaintiff:
Charles Rhodes
Defendant:
City of Hollywood Florida, Chief of Police Sanchez, John Chidsey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhodes v. City of Hollywood et al
as 0:2016cv62296
Plaintiff:
Charles Rhodes
Defendant:
City of Hollywood, Peter Bober and Christina Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Suarez v. City of Hollywood et al
as 0:2016cv62215
Plaintiff:
Jean Suarez
Defendant:
City of Hollywood , Chief of Police Tomas Sanchez , Taser International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
