Cases 41 - 50 of 67
Tao v. Blair
as 1:2018cv03543
Plaintiff:
Dr. Cheng Tao
Defendant:
Anthony Blair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03309
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Lockard v. Cook, Incorporated et al
as 8:2017cv03107
Plaintiff:
Chad Lockard
Defendant:
Cook, Incorporated , Cook Group Incorporated , Cook Medical, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Li et al v. Walsh, et al
as 9:2016cv81871
Plaintiff:
LAN LI , YING TAN , TAO XIONG and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH WALSH, JOSEPH WALSH, JR., J. MARCUS PAYNE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0022
Zhang et al v. Raymond James & Associates Inc., et al
as 1:2016cv24655
Plaintiff:
Zheng Zhang , Haiyun Hu , Lixia Wang and others
Defendant:
Raymond James & Associates Inc., , Joel Burstein and Ariel Quiros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chanel, Inc. v. 7788 Jewelry&Gifts store et al
as 0:2016cv62190
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
7788 Jewelry&Gifts store, alice, Amybaby Jewelry and Clothes Accessory Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Cheng Shin Rubber USA, Inc. v. Wabco Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv04180
Plaintiff:
Cheng Shin Rubber USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Wabco Holdings, Inc. and Wabco IP Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv02398
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Maximillian Abreu, et al v. Dmitri Kotikovski
as 14-13774
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAXIMILLIAN ABREU, DARIO SILVESTRO, MICHELLE ZAPATA, on their own behalves and others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DMITRI KOTIKOVSKI
Young v. 6233 International Drive FL LLC et al
as 6:2014cv00446
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Young
Defendant:
6233 International Drive FL LLC , Show-Lain C. Cheng , Jack Cheng and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
