Cases 41 - 50 of 100
Grier v. Hiniger et al
as 5:2018cv00054
Defendant:
S. Taylor, Castillo, Georgia Dept. of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Grier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williamson v. County of Johnson et al
as 3:2018cv00041
Plaintiff:
Douglas Britt Williamson
Defendant:
County of Johnson, Dept. Georgia Correction, Keith Milner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Georgia Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv02329
Plaintiff:
Sherwin Perkins
Defendant:
Georgia Dept of Corrections, Georgia Parole Board, Samuel Olens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Granville v. Georgia Dept of Corrections et al
as 4:2018cv00044
Plaintiff:
Raymond Eugene Granville
Defendant:
Georgia Dept of Corrections and Georgia Dept. of Labors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Mahizhnan et al
as 1:2018cv00074
Plaintiff:
Kevin G. Jones and Schlinda L. Jones
Defendant:
Palamalai Mahizhnan, South Atlanta Hematology-Oncology, P.C., John Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long v. Hall et al
as 4:2018cv00001
Petitioner:
David Heath Long
Respondent:
Hilton Hall and Commissioner of the Georgia Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Mohighman et al
as 1:2018cv00035
Plaintiff:
Kevin G. Jones
Defendant:
Palamalai Mohighman, M.D., John Ferguson, Muthusamy Sekar, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Head et al
as 1:2017cv03980
Petitioner:
Leroy Banks
Respondent:
Frederick J. Head and Georgia Dept. of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodriguez v. Georgia Dept. of Corrections
as 2:2017cv00144
Petitioner:
Diana Rodriguez
Respondent:
Georgia Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Robbins v. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 4:2017cv00095
Plaintiff:
Marquise Ali Robbins
Defendant:
Dept. of Corrections and Valdosta State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
