Cases 41 - 49 of 49
McCorkle et al v. Dixie Pipeline Company et al
as 1:2011cv04190
Plaintiff:
Bonnie McCorkle , Paul W. McCorkle , Jonathan P. McCorkle and others
Defendant:
Dixie Pipeline Company, Enterprise Products Company, Enterprise Products Operating, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States Of America et al v. Airgas Carbonic, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00163
Defendant:
Coca-Cola USA, Vital Pharma, Inc, ABC Compounding Company, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
United States Of America and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
McCorkle v. United States of America
as 6:2011cv01193
Petitioner:
William J. McCorkle
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. McCorkle et al
as 1:2010cv00990
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Charles E. McCorkle and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 551
Chaney et al v. Coventry Health and Life Insurance Co. et al
as 7:2009cv01441
Plaintiff:
Evin Chaney, Evin Chaney, Evin Chaney and others
Defendant:
Coventry Health and Life Insurance Co. and Coventry Health and Life Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Riches et al v. Stinson et al
as 1:2008cv00174
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches, Nina J. Thomas, William J. McCorkle and others
Defendant:
Kijuan Ezekial Stinson and Jose A. Trespalacos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCorkle v. Ocean Gate General Contractors, Inc.
as 9:2007cv80783
Plaintiff:
John McCorkle and John McCorkle
Defendant:
Ocean Gate General Contractors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
McCorkle v. Medical Resources, et al
as 9:2007cv80784
Plaintiff:
Judi McCorkle and Judi McCorkle
Defendant:
Medical Resources, LLC. and Lalita Janke
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
