Cases 41 - 50 of 510
Halbert v. Neely
as 7:2023cv00824
Petitioner:
Natalie Dawn Halbert
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Picado v. Ender et al
as 1:2023cv22393
Plaintiff:
Yury Picado
Defendant:
Natalie Ender, Judge Tanya Brinkley, Leonard Thompson, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lawson v. On the River Hospitality, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Natalie Lawson
Defendant:
On the River Hospitality, LLC, On the River Fellowship, Inc. and Cool River Tubing Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-11993
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
WILSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13004
Plaintiff:
NATALIE WILSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02430
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Schmidt v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02401
Plaintiff:
Natalie Schmidt
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Natalie Eliodor v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 23-11661
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATALIE ELIODOR
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Mockler v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2023cv01024
Plaintiff:
Natalie Mockler
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
