Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Ali v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2017cv00797
Plaintiff: Zaid Ali
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Van Ness Law Firm, PLC and LendingHome Funding Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ness v. United States Department of the Interior
as 8:2016cv02789
Plaintiff: Kathalene Ness
Defendant: United States Department of the Interior
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551
Ness v. United States Department of the Interior et al
as 8:2016mc00110
Plaintiff: Kathalene Ness
Defendant: United States Department of the Interior
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4208
Ness v. United States Department of the Interior et al
as 8:2016mv00110
Plaintiff: Kathalene Ness
Defendant: United States Department of the Interior
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4208
Ness v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al
as 8:2016cv00199
Plaintiff: Melinda Ness
Defendant: Aetna Life Insurance Company and Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002
Amador v. Van Ness Law Firm
as 9:2015cv80973
Plaintiff: Alva Amador
Defendant: Van Ness Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HOPE v. BELL et al
as 7:2015cv00065
Plaintiff: NICKOLAS VAN NESS HOPE
Defendant: BELL, SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS and SHIRLEY LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Estate of Eliot Ness v. Diebold, Incorporated et al
as 0:2015cv60516
Plaintiff: The Estate of Eliot Ness
Defendant: Diebold, Incorporated and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hope v. NESMITH et al
as 7:2014cv00206
Plaintiff: NICKOLAS VAN NESS HOPE
Defendant: PAMELA NESMITH, WILLIAM WOOLRIDGE and JAMIE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Levett et al
as 1:2014cv02830
Plaintiff: James Edward Tucker
Defendant: Eric J. Levett, Rockdale County Local Government, County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?